A question came came up in correspondence I’d not thought much about – Is Brahman God?
It’s an interesting consideration. We might simply say yes, in the impersonal sense of God.
After all, in God Realization when we merge with the divine, we transcend Atman and become Brahman.
But to say Brahman is God is a bit of a generalization.
To explain, the Vedas describe Brahman in several ways. There is ParamBrahm, the one non-dual totality. But this is total unmanifest nothingness. Myself, I don’t equate that with God although it’s not distinct from God.
Within that boundless nothing are 2 aspects. Not really qualities but in that direction: alertness and liveliness.
Nirguna Brahm is Totality without qualities and unmanifest.
Saguna Brahm is Totality that is “becoming”. That liveliness stirs the alertness to become aware. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi described the mechanism as memory (Smriti). That remembers itself, stirring it into qualities.
At this point, there is nothing expressed but the qualities of awareness and intelligence are alive. This is what I associate with God, the formless impersonal. Shiva as observer. God the Father.
I wouldn’t say Nirguna Brahm is more or less than Saguna or even that there is any real difference. But for me, divinity is inherently awake to itself.
It’s possible my opinion on this will change over time but at this point, to me God is alive Brahman.
Average rating / 5. Vote count:
No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.