The Energy Bodies (Koshas)

I first began talking about the energy bodies here in 2009. When I came back to the topic in more detail about a year ago, a definition error crept in I should have caught.

Firstly, “energy bodies” refers to what are commonly called Auras. In Sanskrit, the more accurate term is koshas or sheaths. They interpenetrate one another and each more subtle one is a little less distinct and larger. The Buddhist term for them is Skandhas.

Here is the list:
Annamaya     physical, etheric
Pranamaya     energy, emotional
Manonmaya     mental, sensory
Vijnanamaya     intellect, Buddhi
Anandamaya     bliss, celestial, causal
Chittamaya     qualified consciousness, flow
Atmamaya     Atman or cosmic Self, Sat

The error comes up over the term Chitta. Chit is consciousness. Chitta is modified consciousness, often a reference to thoughts or subconscious impressions. Some also use chitta to describe the source of manas, buddhi, and ahamkara. (mind, intellect, & ego) In the context of the mind, this is perfectly valid. But defining Chittamaya kosha, more subtle than the celestial, as the storehouse of impressions is incorrect. Our baggage is found largely in the energy and mental bodies.

Lived Experience
The koshas also highlight the distinction between typical life and the enlightened experience. Prior to awakening, the lower 3 bodies dominate our experience – our thoughts, feelings and sensations.

When enough of the fog of past impressions are resolved, the deeper levels become apparent. When we reach Makara above the third eye, kundalini becomes stable and the full-time witness arises. We shift into the intellect level and the “resolute intellect” comes on-line.

With Self Realization we shift to Atman. As it becomes established, it is described as sat chit ananda – note the names of the last koshas above. We’re now living from the 3 subtler koshas, experiencing daily life through the “illusion” of the denser koshas.

Detail
To fill this out further, lets explore each kosha in a little more detail

Annamaya – literally food body. This is our gross physical body and its etheric underpinning, sustained by eating.

Pranamaya – this is the actual energy body, described as prana or vayu (air) or breath. The Vedas describe 5 pranas and 5 sub-pranas. This is the level of the functioning chakras & nadis. It’s also where we store our energetic baggage – nadi sludge, energetic knots, and so forth.

Manonmaya – relates to the term Manas or mind. This is where the ideas can get confused.
The mental sheath has 3 aspects:
Manas itself – the habit-driven sensory mind
Chitta – the subconscious impressions: samskaras (strong mental impressions) and vasanas (desires). These lead to our inclinations and motives plus our emotions. These inclinations are our unresolved “karma”.
Ahamkara (I sense, preferences)

All actions make impressions in the subtle body, mainly the mind and energy bodies. But do those impressions bind us or do we process and release them? Also, while we may not consciously know how to “read auras“, we are subconsciously picking up others “vibes”. If we’re an unskilled empath, we’re also taking on their baggage.

Browsing “Kosha” on-line, there is all kinds of conflicting interpretations.
Some attribute Chitta to Vijnanamaya but this is incorrect as the intellect is free of impressions. Some use the mind definition of Chitta to define Chittamaya kosha (I copied that mistake) and some use Chittamaya to describe the Chitta aspect of Manonmaya. It’s important to be clear on these differences.

Vijnanamaya – discernment; this is Buddhi, the intellect, our decision-maker. It may also be called dharmamaya. It is our conscience that drives our values and purpose. It is often overshadowed by the activity of the denser koshas, the mind and emotions.

This is the first sattvic (clear) kosha and is also called prajna. Some experience this as intuition. I mentioned above how this level becomes much more conscious at makara, with the witness. We then reside beyond the mind. With the “resolute intellect” we gain “evenness of mind in pleasure and pain, loss and gain, victory and defeat” as described in the Bhagavad Gita (2v41). These are the mechanics.

The intellect has just one issue to resolve, the “mistake of the intellect“. This is when it shifts from looking out and dividing to looking in and joining. This heralds the shift to Unity consciousness. It also defines the “experience and become” process of the stages of Unity and the development of wholeness or totality.

It’s also worth noting that human development, as studied in psychology, works through the development of these sheaths progressively: body, emotions, mind, intellect.

When people refer to the “subtle body“, they are generally referring to the Energy and Mental bodies but may be including the intellect. When they refer to the “astral“, they may mean the energy body or either combination of ‘subtle body’. It’s one of the sloppiest of terms out there.

Anandamaya – the Bliss sheath and celestial. Deva-atma-shakti. This is the home of name and form where our universe first becomes. As such it is home of the Pranava, Aum. Also of Hiranya Garbha, the golden egg, seed form of the universe. It is sattvic and the home of the universal chakras (we share the same ones) and of kundalini Shakti, the flow and source of all energetic expression. As the celestial, it is home to celestial beings; saints, sages, and devas. (not to be confused with astral beings) Clearly, this is not a personal kosha but a common one shared by all beings in this universe.

When we clean out the baggage of the denser sheaths, this kosha, which is always with us, becomes conscious. Then we live in bliss, either foreground or background. It can be noted here this isn’t the highest bliss, simply when it first becomes established.

It’s also worth noting the dominant element for each of the first koshas:
anna = earth, prana = water, mano = fire, intellect = air, bliss = space. Not physical elements but their seeds. Note how space is nested.

Because the chakras also have these correspondences, we might conclude there is a relationship between the chakras and the koshas. But that’s more generalized. Note how all the chakras function in the prana sheath and all have their source in the bliss sheath.

The Taittiriya Upanishad describes much of the above, calling it the pancha kosha or 5 sheaths. This is as far as many traditions go. If they’re based on Self Realization, they would not see anything further as a kosha. To someone in Cosmic Consciousness, Atman is eternal being. Not a sheath.

However, at the end of Unity, when consciousness does what the intellect did prior, it turns from perpetually looking in on itself to turning and looking out. This is the dawning of Brahman and a recognition that consciousness and Atman have an origin and thus are also sheaths.

Chittamaya – qualified consciousness. Some describe this as the wisdom sheath, but it should not be confused with the Chitta of the mind. This, we could say is the Chitta of God, Lila, the play of creation, flow.

It’s not quite accurate to call this a “body of consciousness“. Atman is consciousness so this level is qualified consciousness, consciousness becoming.

I’ve also seen the term Chaitya used here, meaning soul.

Atmamaya – Atman or cosmic Self, “body” of consciousness, also called Sat. Beyond Atman is Brahman. Brahman has no form.

States
It’s also worth noting how the states of consciousness correspond.
– Waking state is associated with our physical reality
– Dreaming is associated with the subtle bodies (not a spiritual realm)
– Sleep brings us to the celestial. This becomes conscious with development.
– Turiya, the fourth, is pure consciousness. We experience bliss (the kosha) when passing in and out of pure being.

As I noted above, with established Self Realization or Cosmic Consciousness, we live more in sat chit ananda, the 3 subtle koshas.

Lokas
The 7 lokas or worlds are all contained within the Anandamaya kosha. Again, we might seek correspondences but they’re not one to one. Bhur is associated with the physical, Bhuvah with the subtle, and the heavens with the celestial.

Gradually, everything comes together in one wholeness.
Davidya

Tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to The Energy Bodies (Koshas)

  1. Pingback: Pattern Recognition - Davidya.ca

  2. Pingback: The Pain Body - Davidya.ca

  3. Pingback: The Mind of Yoga - Davidya.ca

  4. Pingback: On Angels and Other Subtle Beings – Part 1 of 2 - Davidya.ca

  5. Pingback: Yoga to Purify the Mind - Davidya.ca

  6. Pingback: The Second Stage - Davidya.ca

  7. Pingback: Layers of Observing - Davidya.ca

  8. Pingback: The Chakras – Universal and Personal - Davidya.ca

  9. Pingback: Healing Everything – Part 1 of 3 - Davidya.ca

  10. Pingback: The Seeing Seer - Davidya.ca

  11. Pingback: The Layers | Davidya.ca

  12. NN says:

    Hi David

    Are siddhis related to these koshas? For instance, is it wrong to say that if you have certain siddhis, like reading minds, then you have progressed through/to xx layer?

    • Davidya says:

      No. The siddhis are symptoms of specific energy channels being open and specific laws of nature being active. It varies some which ones come online and when.

      We might relate the koshas to the chakras but that’s only broadly as mentioned in the article.

      To some extent, we can relate abilities with refinement and that does have some correspondence with stages, but thats broad too.

      Some people gain siddhis with birth or long before waking, some long after.

      It’s worth noting that Patanjali indicates we can’t read minds in the Yoga Sutra and explains why. We can however read anothers state of mind and inclinations.

      More common siddhis include knowledge of past lives, seeing inside the body, the ability to call on happiness or peace, and so on.

      There are some persistent ideas out there, like someone in Unity should be able to fly but perfection of the physiology is distinct from stages in consciousness.

      • NN says:

        Thanks. Regarding the ability to read minds, is that then the same as or distinct from empath gifts? They sound a lot alike they way you describe them here.

        • Davidya says:

          Again, we can’t “read minds” because we cannot step into anothers local mind. We can experience aspects of what it’s like to be another but we do so from our own perspective.

          Even though the information we get may be somewhat similar, the means by which we get it is distinct. For example, phone and email are quite distinct even if both are used to arrange a lunch.

          An intuitive might gain some sense of the concerns of another, depending on the style of intuition.

          A psychic might pick up threads of someones history or a dead relative.

          An empath does a short energetic merge with one aspect of anothers experience. For example, an intellectual empath would pick up something of that persons worldview. An unskilled intellectual empath would tend to take on something of the conceptual approach of those around them.

          All of these are quite distinct but none of this is “reading minds” and apprehending the specific thoughts of another. Otherwise, as the Yoga Sutra puts it “there would be an over-occurrence of intellect observing intellect and confusion of memory.”

          In other words, our individual thoughts are private but their tone, theme and the memes behind them are not. We broadcast them all the time.

        • Davidya says:

          btw – the references in the article itself to empath, etc was just noting ways we clutter and add baggage to those layers.

          The Aura Reading link lists some of the different ways of knowing from that perspective, differentiating empath skills, the clairs (subtle perception), and intuitive & psychic knowing. They’re quite distinct.

          • NN says:

            Hi David

            This “We can however read anothers state of mind and inclinations” just felt a lot like an aspect of what happens when I do an empath merge (unskilled). Then I started to wonder if they were the same thing. Thanks.

          • Davidya says:

            OK – that would be what Rose calls an Intellectual Empath gift.
            Each type of knowing uses different means and is thus a different way of seeing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv - have your latest blog post linked here.