I was taking a bit more of a look around Takuin.com and came across his article on Being. He answers the question what is being? But we can then ask what is the source of being? What comes before existence? I drafted a response post but on first read wonder if its, as the blog name suggests, too deep. Explaining the source of being requires a framework for the whole enchilada, a picture that took a whole chapter to explain. A chapter thats at the end of the book, after much prior framework building.
This rather comes to the core of the writing. Who am I writing for? Is there an audience for questions like this? The 7 steps of creation are rather more ‘out there’ (in there?) than 7 steps to a good relationship. The profundity and implications of a detailed description of what is and how it is are obvious. But is there an audience? How large a circle is the self-referral value? (laughs)
What do you think?